top of page

5 Hiring Mistakes That Quietly Slow Down Your AI Start-Up ( What I See From Experience — What to Do Instead)

  • Writer: Magda Cheang
    Magda Cheang
  • 3 hours ago
  • 5 min read


Hiring in an AI start-up is supposed to accelerate growth. In reality, a lot of teams I speak with feel the opposite. They just got funding, they are excited to grow the team - but things get delayed, slowed down and too messy.


Strong candidates drop out midway, and the team ends up stretched thin trying to keep product, go-to-market, and delivery moving.  Founders are still doing their day to day and even more instead of having that new hire deal with that function. They are spreading themselves too thin whilst that open headcount is not filled.


From the outside, it can look like a talent shortage.


From experience, it usually isn’t. I've taken my experience scaling teams at Meta, Zoom and others and applied their talent-density approach to start-up hiring.


After working closely with AI start-ups trying to hire AI engineers, machine learning talent, GTM talent, and sales engineers, I keep seeing the same patterns. But, luckily, these mistakes can be fixed.




Hiring an AI Engineer into your AI start-up
AI Engineer




1. The Role Isn’t Actually Clear (Especially in AI Hiring)


What I see from my experience:


AI start-ups often try to combine too many responsibilities into one role—AI engineering, machine learning, data pipelines, and sometimes even GTM or customer-facing work.


On paper, it feels efficient. Of course, you would prefer if someone has lots of competencies and experiences, as you may have limited budget and limited headcount to reach your goals. In reality, it confuses candidates and slows hiring down.


You’ll notice with this approach:


  • The wrong candidates apply

  • Strong candidates don’t engage

  • Internally, expectations keep shifting

  • All the candidates you interview, as missing something (either a skill-set, experience or something else) and you’re not feeling confident to make a hiring decision.


What to do instead to hire faster:


Get specific about outcomes, not titles.


Ask the following instead:


  • What does success look like in the first 90 days?

  • Is this role focused on AI engineering, machine learning, GTM execution, or sales engineering?

  • What are the 3–5 non-negotiable skills?

  • What are non-negotiable experiences?

  • Previous start-up experience, specific technology experience?


From what I’ve seen, the fastest hiring teams are the clearest on what they actually need.


2. Your Hiring Process Is Too Slow for AI, ML, GTM and Sales Engineering Talent


What I see from experience:


Strong candidates in AI engineering, machine learning, GTM, and sales engineering are usually in multiple processes at once.


If your hiring process drags, you’re not being careful—you’re losing them to competitors.



You need to balance a rigorous assessment process that gives you all the data and signals you need, with a fast process.


I’ve seen fantastic candidates disappear simply because feedback took too long or interviews were spaced too far apart.


What to do instead:


Tighten your process:


  • Keep hiring cycles within 1–2 weeks

  • Combine interview stages where possible e.g Founder Interviews + Culture Interview (combined), followed by technology assessment.

  • Align decision-makers before going to market.


Speed is a competitive advantage across both technical and GTM hiring.


3. Waiting for the “Perfect” AI, ML or GTM Candidate


What I see from experience:


This is one of the most common blockers across both technical and go-to-market hiring.


You sit down and make a list of all the requirements for the role, the characteristics, experiences and competencies. Or you write a basic and vague job description, because you’re in a rush, and perhaps you don’t know what “perfect” looks like as it has not been defined well. You may perhaps base your decision on your notions of what a perfect candidate brings to the table.


There’s always a reason to wait and delay your hiring decisions:


  • “Let’s see more AI engineers”

  • “We need deeper ML experience”

  • “We want a more senior GTM or sales engineer profile”

  • “ The person had no wow factor. They are excellent, but I’m not sure”

  •  Relying on gut feelings rather than a data-driven interviews can also lead to indecision, frustration on your part as an AI Start-Up Founder, and importantly, delays.


Meanwhile, the role stays open and your ability to execute slows down.


What to do instead:


Focus on impact, not perfection.


Ask yourself these questions:


  • Can this person solve the core problem we have right now?

  • Do they have strong fundamentals in AI/ML, GTM, or sales engineering?

  • Can they grow with the company with some supervision?

  • Do they have the majority of the skills and the right attitude to be successful?

  • Have they been successful in the past with a proven track record that applies in my start-up’s context?


In most cases, a strong 80% match hired quickly beats a “perfect” candidate who never arrives.


4. Your Candidate Experience Is Costing You Offers


What I see from experience:


Candidates in AI engineering, ML, GTM, and sales engineering all have options. How you run your process directly affects whether they stay engaged.


Small delays or unclear communication can change perception fast.


I’ve seen strong AI tech candidates drop out late in the process simply because things felt disorganised or slow. Protracted recruitment processes make candidates think that your company moves slowly in general, they make assumptions and may have a bad impression based on this. It may not reflect the reality at all (you move fast as a start-up!) but they could get the wrong impression.


What to do instead:


Make it simple and consistent:


  • Set expectations clearly from the start

  • Respond quickly after each stage, if you had a positive interview - slack you Co-Founder and move the person to the next round, don’t wait too long

  • Keep interviews structured and relevant, explain what the stages of the process are so candidates know what to expect

  • If there are delays, communicate - do not ghost candidates 


A good candidate experience directly improves offer acceptance rates.


5. You’re Only Relying on Job Posts for AI, ML, GTM and Sales Engineering Talent


What I see from experience:


Posting a job and waiting rarely works well—especially for AI engineers, machine learning specialists, GTM talent, and sales engineers.


The strongest candidates are usually not actively applying. They’re already employed and only move for the right opportunity. Or, you have hundreds of applicants, but in reality only 1-3 actually meet the requirements, so you waste time on unnecessary CV review and unnecessary interviews.


What to do instead:


Be proactive:


  • Reach out directly to relevant candidates

  • Tap into referrals and networks

  • Target people already doing the exact work you need


In both technical and GTM hiring, the best candidates are found—not inbound.


The Bigger Picture


What I see repeatedly is this:


An open role isn’t just a hiring issue—it’s a growth constraint. Every day you waste hoping for the right talent to find you, every delay in interview feedback, leads to loss of productivity, product improvements and revenue.


In others words this is what will happen:


Product development slows down. GTM execution stalls. Revenue timelines slip. Teams get stretched across too many priorities.


The AI start-ups that move fastest aren’t necessarily better at hiring—they’re just clearer, quicker, and more decisive when they find the right AI engineers, ML talent, GTM hires, or sales engineers. They have built their "hiring muscle" and hiring operational framework.



If You Want to Move Faster in AI Hiring


If you’re currently trying to hire AI engineers, machine learning talent, GTM talent, or sales engineers and running into delays, it’s usually fixable faster than expected.


Even small changes in clarity, speed, and sourcing approach can significantly improve outcomes, you simply need to start with the right questions.


We work with AI start-ups to introduce pre-vetted candidates who are ready to interview quickly, helping reduce time-to-hire and improve quality of pipeline. We have already spoken to them, assessed their skill-sets, mind-sets and abilities so you can fast-track your hiring processes.


Reach out for a chat where we will give you some suggestions to improve your hiring velocity.





 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page